Bil Browning

Another reason why guns and teens don't mix

Filed By Bil Browning | January 14, 2006 9:53 AM | comments

Filed in: Politics

Yesterday's Indianapolis Star had an article on three teenagers from the Evansville area who were driving around and shooting deer from their car. The teens weren't hunting - they were "poaching." While they've admitted to shooting and killing over 30 deer, they didn't keep any of them; they let them die and rot wherever the noble animals fell. They killed for the blood and violence.

This reminds me of why I think Indiana and the US need tighter gun laws. You have to be 18 to vote or buy cigarettes. You have to be 21 to buy alcohol. And yet, any under-age kid can get a hunting license if they've taken a "hunter education" course. My entire 6th grade class in middle school had to take the course and it was a complete waste of time. I will never go hunting - yet I was forced to take the class. Wouldn't the time have been better spent showing me the dangers of smoking or drinking? I think more people will drink liquor than will hunker down in a blind during duck season. Perhaps a little more focus on civic duties to prepare for voting instead of preparing me to be able to kill an innocent animal?

Not that these kids had a license for this atrocity. But taking away their access to guns until they are 21 would have definitely ended this before it started. While you have to be 18+ to get a permit to carry a handgun in Indiana, no permit is required at all for rifles. My partner's father is a gun nut who gave him a rifle before he was in his teens.

Today, hunting, which was a crucial part of survival 100,000 years ago, is nothing more than a violent form of recreation that is unnecessary for the subsistence of the vast majority of hunters. Hunting has contributed to the extinction of animal species all over the world. Although less than 5 percent of the U.S. population hunts, it is permitted in many wildlife refuges, national forests and state parks, and other public lands. Forty percent of hunters kill animals on public land, which means that every year, on the half-billion acres of public land in the U.S., millions of animals who “belong” to the more than 95 percent of Americans who do not hunt are slaughtered and maimed by hunters, and by some estimates, poachers (like these kids) kill just as many illegally.

Perhaps it is time for Indiana to revisit its views on hunting specifically and guns in general.

Three juveniles face 123 misdemeanor charges in the illegal shooting of at least 30 deer in southern Indiana's Warrick County over the past year.

State conservation officers, acting on complaints of shots being fired at night, set up patrols along county roads and saw two teenagers shooting at deer from a car in the county east of Evansville. A third juvenile was later found to be involved, Conservation Officer Gordon Woods said.

Authorities believe 30 to 50 deer were shot in the head and neck, then left to die.

Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

21 to get a gun? Who would George get to fight the "war on terra"?
Aren't a lot of those kids under 21? Come to think of it, that would be a double bonus! Great idea!

Hm.. My trackbacks don't seem to be working. But I responded to Mr Browning here

Yea I know this is old but this is incredibly poor information. I work with one of the guys who got in trouble for this, and he is now 24, which in January of 06 wouldve still put him well out of his teenage years.

I understand and support your cause, but dont make it a stand to revoke the rights of a demographic that had no involvement.