Bil Browning

Discrimination fails again

Filed By Bil Browning | July 18, 2006 5:44 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics

The US House of Representatives has failed to pass a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex civil marriage. Even though the outcome was predicted, the right wing fundies wanted a vote on the amendment to serve as a homophobic litmus test of sorts. The amendment had already failed to pass the Senate earlier this year.

Opponents dismissed the proposal as both discriminatory and legislatively irrelevant because of the Senate vote. The measure is "all for the purpose of pandering to a narrow political base." said Rep. Tammy Baldwin, an openly gay Democrat from Wisconsin. "This hateful and unnecessary amendment is unworthy of our great Constitution."

The marriage amendment is part of the "American values agenda" the House is taking up this week that includes a pledge protection bill and a vote on President Bush's expected veto of a bill promoting embryonic stem cell research. Bush has asked, and social conservatives demanded, that the same sex marriage ban be considered in the run-up to the election.

The White House, in a statement Tuesday, urged passage of the measure. "When activist judges insist on redefining the fundamental institution of marriage for their states or potentially for the entire country, the only alternative left to make the people's voice heard is an amendment of the Constitution."

Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Marla R. Stevens | August 15, 2006 5:27 AM

Oh, posh-tosh! Discrimination is perfectly intact, only piling on failed.

You had only to watch (or later read) what was said in the floor debate to know that most of those who voted against it, just like the senators before them, did so because they were secure that the discrimination -- in the form of DOMA -- was safely intact and that they didn't need an amendment to keep it that way or that, if for some reason DOMA fell, it would be very easy to pass a federal marriage ban amendment on such a decision's heels.

The amendment means very little. It's DOMA that matters -- and DOMA still stands.