Rev Irene Monroe

Can a Morehouse College Man be openly gay?

Filed By Rev Irene Monroe | May 27, 2008 4:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Living, The Movement
Tags: homophobic behavior, Morehouse College, racial bias, racism

Since its inception in 1867 Morehouse College is noted as the bastion of black male leadership. Embodying W. E.B. Dubois's theory of The Talented Tenth, where "exceptional black men" would be the ones to lead the race, Morehouse College has unquestionably produced a pantheon of noted black men.

However, nowhere in its development of strong black men were gay, and bisexual men included in its elite brotherhood. And now, more than a century later, gay and bisexual Morehouse men are still struggling to be accepted.

Michael Brewer, a senior at Morehouse is trying to help the college foster a more welcoming environment, but much of his efforts on campus fall on deaf ears.

But LGBTQ activists are listening and so too is the Los Angeles Times with its recent article "Morehouse College faces its own bias --against gays."

With more and more students of Brewer's generation arriving on campus openly gay and bisexual, Morehouse's administration continues to lack the cultural competence and sensitivity to address the issue, fostering students to think there is only one way to be a Morehouse man.

For example, Devrin Lindsay, a junior, told the Los Angeles Times that an effeminate man who "swishes down the campus like he's on a runway" damages Morehouse's image for both parents with students looking to attend the college.

But it is Morehouse's highly publicized 2002 gay-bashing incident that has damaged its image, and has no doubt taught the administration very little.

On November 4, 2002, a Morehouse College student sustained a fractured skull from his classmate, sophomore Aaron Price, not surprisingly the son of an ultra-conservative minister. Price uncontrollably beat his victim on the head with a baseball bat for allegedly looking at him in the shower.

According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC), the victim, whose name was not disclosed to protect his privacy, did not have his glasses on and allegedly peered at Price through the shower curtain of his stall to see if Price was his roommate.

But many on Morehouse's campus felt then and do now that peering in a student's shower is an act that not only transgresses Price's privacy as a man, but also warrants some form of brute retaliation as an indication of his manhood. "A lot of people believe that he deserved to get beaten up if he was looking in the shower stall. Students are very wary of any action that could be misconstrued as a gay overture," sophomore Mubarak Guy, who is a friend of Price's, told the AJC in 2002.

During the arguments for and against convicting Price of the state's first hate crime, Assistant Fulton County District Attorney Holly Hughes asked the jury to remember the words Price allegedly uttered "when he beat his victim with a baseball bat: 'Faggot, you're gay, gay ... I hate these Morehouse faggots.'"

Morehouse is lauded as the jewel of black academia. Founded two years after the end of the Civil War by William Jefferson White in the basement of Springfield Baptist Church in Augusta, Ga., Morehouse most famous alumnus is the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., graduated from Morehouse in 1948 with a B.A. in sociology.

But King had his own problems with gay men.

Sadly, Bayard Rustin, the gay man who was chief organizer and strategist for the 1963 March on Washington that further catapulted Martin Luther King onto the world stage, was not the beneficiary of King's dream.

In a spring 1987 interview with "Open Hands," a resource for ministries affirming the diversity of human sexuality, Rustin stated that he pushed King to speak up on his behalf, but King did not. In John D'Emilo's book "Lost Prophet: The Life and Times of Bayard Rustin," D'Emilo wrote: "Rustin offered to resign in the hope that he would force the issue. Much to his chagrin, King did not reject the offer. At the time, King was also involved in a major challenge to the conservative leadership of the National Baptist Convention, and one of his ministerial lieutenants in the fight was also gay. Basically, King said, 'I can't take on two queers at one time.'"

Price was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Price expressed no emotion as the guilty verdict was read.

Although Morehouse College President then in 2002 Walter Massey stated that "homophobia is not a new topic at Morehouse" in commenting on the beating of the student in a campus wide address, little has changed.

After the 2002 beating, gay students formed a support group, Safe Space, which Brewer belongs to. But the group this year only had about five active members.

In the 1980's and 1990's it was more dangerous to be openly gay and bisexual on Morehouse's campus than it was on the streets in black neighborhoods.

Jafari Sinclaire Allen, a professor at University of Texas was an openly gay student at Morehouse in the late 1980s and early 1990s. He recalls fleeing campus one evening after a forum to address homophobia turned violently homophobic. And throughout the 1990's Morehouse was listed on the Princeton Review's top 20 homophobic campuses.

But homophobic incidents at Morehouse speak to a larger issue plaguing men of African descent in this country -- acknowledging their sexuality.

With the dominant culture's iconography of black male sexuality ranging from sexual predator to pornographic object, both the dominant heterosexual and the gay culture's fear and fascination with black male sexuality may satisfy racist paranoid fantasies, but also strips men of African descent of both their possession of their sexuality as well as their language to safely express it.

Gay white Photographer Robert Mapplethorpe's notorious "Man in a Polyester Suit" maintains the stereotypical convention of black male sexuality as a monstrous phallus that is dangerous, out of control and animalistic. The gay white male photographer's central focus on a black uncircumcised penis protruding from an unzipped pair of polyester pants reasserts the mythology of the super-sexualized black man.

Many African-American men on the "down low"(DL) say there are two salient features that contribute to their subculture -- white gay culture and the Black Church. DL men deliberately segregate themselves from both black and white gay cultures as an alternative black masculinity that only wants to have sex and socialize with other black men. But class is a factor here, too. While many gay African-American men have the economic mobility to reside outside of the black community and are likely to intermingle with the dominant gay culture, most DL men don't.

"They've created a community of their own, a cultural party where whites aren't invited. Labeling yourself as DL is a way to disassociate from everything white and upper class. And that is a way for DL men to assert some power," George Ayala, director of education for AIDS Project Los Angeles, told the Times in the 2003 article.

The Black Church's gender ideology and sexual politics also contribute to this subculture. A study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life indicated that African-American churchgoers are the least likely of all faiths to support gay civil rights. The Forum also indicated that since 2006, black Protestants are less likely than other Protestant groups to believe that gays should have equal rights. For example, black Protestant support for gays dipped to a low of 40 percent last year, down from 65 percent in 1996 and 59 percent in 1992.

With homophobia running as rampant in historically black colleges and universities as it is in black churches, there are no safe places to openly engage the subject of black sexuality. With sexuality being both socially constructed and pre-formative, black male sexuality due to racist stereotypes becomes a caricature of itself that is heavily imprinted in society. Black gay sexuality within African-American culture is perceived to further threaten not only black male heterosexuality, but also the ontology of blackness itself.

"If you look historically at what black males were subjected to in the white community, to hear a black male saying he's gay goes against the grain of society's picture," said Florence Bonner, head of the sociology department at Howard University in Washington, D.C., another HBCU. "The African-American community suffers from not having enough outlets for cross connection, or for all of us in general to talk about sexuality and the impact of living in fear of stating your sexuality."

As the nation's largest liberal arts college for men, Morehouse continues to confer degrees on more men of African descent than any institution of higher education in this country.

Although Morehouse has always had a vibrant underground gay community, Morehouse has carefully crafted its image as an institution that produces strong men of African descent. And part of its crafted image is the legacy of the strong Morehouse man who is unquestionably heterosexual.

If Morehouse is to continue to be the jewel of black academia nurturing the talents and gifts of its exceptional black men, then it must ask itself to what degree does its tradition hinders its goal?

Recent Entries Filed under The Movement:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Thanks for the post, Rev. Irene. As usual, you've given us a lot to think about. I have a couple of questions: First, can you please expand on the notion of downlow? And second: what are student groups currently doing to address issues of diversity and respond to hate crimes?

Robert Ganshorn Robert Ganshorn | May 28, 2008 6:51 AM

If Morehouse feels this way why aren't they challenged to admit it? I always hated Jerry Falwell, but he was honest about who he hated too. Liberty Bible Baptist College didn't want ya and they would admit it.

Morehouse should announce that they are not an inclusive institution and why. They should clearly state their goals, and why they believe some people are entitled to success, and others are not.

Regarding Dr. King, 40 years ago is a long time, but I am still waiting to see an NAACP float at a Gay Pride Parade.

Thank you for your post Rev. Monroe

It's funny - I had a fling with a younger black guy a few years ago. He was about 20. He was obviously gay, but refused to acknowledge it. Instead, he just claimed his identity as a straight black man who also happened to sleep with guys. He always wanted to hang around me publicly and at work so I think he really wanted to come out, but he was terrified of what his mother and church would think. I ended it when I found out he'd gotten his girlfriend pregnant.

Rev. Irene, you bring up issues that seem enigmatic to me even after long and careful thought about gay black men and gay white men and the ways they interact and fail to interact, and after about a decade of self-study on African-American culture and history. Additionally, I have been sexually and/or romantically involved with a number of black men, and the more understanding I develop, the more questions I have. I could possibly write a book, and maybe someday I will, but I won't do it here. (Bilerico readers throughout the globe sigh of relief upon reading that promise!)

But in short, to answer the question in your title: Yes, of course, a Morehouse man can be openly gay. However, he might have to wait until after graduation, the way that an American gay or lesbian soldier today waits until she/he has the honorable discharge papers in hand before coming out publicly. Whether it is Morehouse or any other university, once they hand you that diploma, there is no widely accepted process for them to take it back (ruling out something technical, such as a recording error was made and you didn't actually meet graduation requirements.)

I agree partially with Robert (Comment #2) that Morehouse should decide which side of this issue they are on, then implement their policy openly and fully. I presume that Morehouse has some non-discrimination policy of its own, and they should define clearly whether they consider sexual orientation (and gender identity as well) to be a protected category.

Short of getting expelled, it is admirable that current students such as Michael Brewer are courageous enough to promote acceptance against an administration that appears to be unsupportive at best and openly prejudicial at worst.

If Morehouse decides that GLBT students aren't welcome, that's unfortunate. But there are scores of quality universities who will accept such students and offer them an excellent education. (My own alma mater, Indiana University, is one of them and I can recommend it most highly. It also has an excellent African-American Studies program.) So for gay Black students who are ready to be out, I would hope that they would not allow the lust for a Morehouse diploma to chain them into the closet for a very important chapter of life.

The "down-low" culture, or sub-culture, touches on the issue whether a person, white or black or whatever, has a right to stay in the closet. I think a person does have that right, even though it is not the healthiest or most admirable of choices. Also, let's note that the D/L culture is also a type of separatist culture, and whether that is good or bad is again a matter for debate. Beyond that, I simply take a "live and let live" attitude toward that population, since they don't seem to want any help or input from the likes of me. I wish them well, but from a distance --- a distance that, in general, they put me at.

Rev. Irene,
Your assertion that Dr. King had problems with gay men isn't supported by the fact that Rustin was his chief lieutenant, his advisor since the Montgomery Bus Boycott days, helped introduce him to the Gandhian non violence doctrine, and helped him form the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1957.

He stood up for Rustin even though some of his MIA (Montgomery Improvement Association) cohorts and later NAACP head Roy Wilkins and the team assembling the 1963 March on Washington were more nervous about his brief association with the Communist Party and his 1953 arrest and conviction on homosexual activity charges.

The media savvy people of the movement were keenly aware of the potential for conservative enemies and J. Edgar Hoover to use it to discredit the movement, so as a compromise because Rustin has skills and talents that were vitally important, he assumed a behind the scenes role.

A man that had a problem with gay people wouldn't have wanted to be in the same room with him, much less interact with him on that level. In fact, according to, King and Rustin spent so much time together doing movement work that Sen. Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. threatened that he would accuse King and Rustin of having a sexual affair.

I'd like to second everything that Monica points out above. She said it better, and I didn't want to take up the space.

Specifically, Rustin's 1963 "behind the scenes role" was that, as a compromise with Roy Wilkins and other Rustin detractors, A. Philip Randolph would be the official Chairman of the March, and Rustin would be his deputy. In reality, Rustin did the lion's share of the planning and co-ordination.

The winning team of Randolph and Rustin was memorialized on the cover of Life Magazine, September 6, 1963. (Scroll down to find this issue about 2/3 down on the linked web page.)