Alex Blaze

Patrick Sammon: Gays should vote for McCain

Filed By Alex Blaze | September 22, 2008 3:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics, The Movement
Tags: Barack Obama, Democrats, federal marriage amendment, gay marriage, gay Republicans, gay rights, health care reform, homophobic behavior, islam, islamophobia, John McCain, John McCain homophobic, LGBT, marriage, movement, palin, patrick sammon, president, republican, Sarah Palin, sarah palin homophobic

Patrick Sammon has an article up in the Washington Blade about why John McCain is good for LGBT people. I kid you not - even though he lied to The Advocate and said that LCR is focused first on LGBT rights in the Republican Party, he turns around and writes a column telling LGBT to vote for John McCain.

His reasons are hilarious, absolutely hilarious. But then he knows that he's coming from an intellectually dishonest position in order to get new donors from the 23% of the LGBT community that voted for Bush in 2004 when LCR didn't endorse him and that he has to push for a sub-par candidate.

His reasons and a few responses are after the jump.

First, McCain is a maverick -- a different kind of Republican who's willing to buck his own party to stand up for what he believes. Case in point is his consistent opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment. He's the only candidate in this race who paid a political price for voting in a way that benefits the LGBT community.

I don't understand the "political price" that he's paid, considering that he's got full fundie support and the Republican nomination for presidency. There isn't much more the party could be doing to support him right now. And why doesn't Obama's opposition to the same FMA count?

But this is just wrong:

FOURTH, McCAIN'S HEALTHCARE reform plan would increase competition, lower prices and improve access. His plan allows people to purchase insurance across state lines thus increasing competition. McCain's proposal emphasizes individual ownership of health insurance, rather than relying on employers. This provides stability after a job loss. And it'll prevent discriminatory practices against gay people by an employer.

Sammon's right - McCain's health care plan is a mix of deregulation, individualization of risk, and a tax credit to sell the whole mess. In fact, he wrote this in a column just this past month in Contingencies:

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition, as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.

Yes, and that worked out so well for the finance industry.

McCain wants to move the tax break employers receive for providing their workers with health care to the individual. What this means is that health care providers will be more free to say no to an individual, effectively disqualifying people with pre-existing conditions from getting coverage.

The point of health care is that people come together to pool their risk, making sure that no one has to bear the cost of an extraordinary disease on their own. Since health care companies wouldn't want to take on someone who they think would have more health care expenses than what they'd pay in premiums (someone who's likely to get cancer because they've already had it, perhaps), they'll simply refuse to take on those individuals. At least at the workplace, eligibility can be guaranteed since health care providers want to take on an entire corporation or business.

Obama's health care plan is less-than-ideal, but McCain's is simply a train-wreck. It's just about the last reason to vote for John McCain.

And here's the actual last reason:

Fifth, he'll provide a strong voice challenging the radical Islamic regimes that criminalize same-sex behavior -- and even execute gay people. McCain wants to confront tyrants like Iran's president. Obama wants to talk to him without preconditions.

I don't even get where this is coming from; will McCain pressure Islamic governments to decriminalize homosexuality? He's never made any indication that he would use the presidential platform to champion gay rights around the world. There's also no explanation of how this would work either - would John McCain bang a few heads together over in the Middle East and they'd just decide to stop being homophobic?

There's no reason for LGBT people to trust McCain, and with his nomination of a true-blue fundamentalist to the running mate slot and promise to nominate more conservative judges, we can be sure that McCain will do what he can to turn back the clock on gay rights.

The LCR should drop the whole "working from the inside" shtick, unless they want to change that to "Working from the inside of the gay community to get Republican votes."

(h/t Pam)

This column isn't meant to be taken at face value, though. No matter what Sammon told The Advocate, LCR is a Republican organization first, a gay one second.

Even gay Republicans are noticing that:

The other day when a representative of a conservative organization asked me to suggest other gay people to participate in an event, I immediately suggested either Patrick Sammon and Scott Tucker of Log Cabin.

Only after I had sent out the e-mail did it occur to me that a year previously, I would not even considered recommending Log Cabin for such an event. What a change Patrick's leadership has brought to the organization. To be sure, we have not always agreed with some of their actions, faulting them for running ads against Mitt Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire.

But, since John McCain wrapped up the Republican nomination, they, as loyal Republicans should, reached out to the campaign and worked to support the party's nominee, voting earlier this month to endorse him.

In St. Paul, at Log Cabin's Big Tent Luncheon, Sammon said he was "never going to be silent when the subject turns to politics" and intended to make clear "how much we care about this party and how much we care about this nation." Not only that, echoing Ronald Reagan, he said intended to fight for the notion that government is not the solution to every problem.

That speech was the most forceful defense of basic Republican principles I had ever heard from a Log Cabin leader.

That pretty much says it all.

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

McCain is now against criminalizing sodomy? Then why does he promise to appoint Supreme Court Justices in the mold of Scalia and Thomas, both of whom voted to maintain the anti-sodomy laws that criminalized homosexuality in the USA? His favorite judges certainly aren't on the side of LGBT citizens!

Haha, my thoughts exactly. Good to be posting on a gay blog.

Brynn Craffey Brynn Craffey | September 22, 2008 6:07 PM

Alex, you ask way too many questions! You'd never make a good Log Cabin Republican!!!

All the Republican party has is spin, and Sammon's column is just more of the same.

We have a monetary and credit famine, which is why the bail out is now destabilising the market, since there is no credit remaining to do expansion, the dollar will perforce become more devalued to increased currency runs as printing continues, and the government's line of credit, indeed, nearly all credit worldwide is just about exhausted.

Secondly, any social programme funded by the market right now is bound for losses; can you imagine the disaster if Bush has actually put any sizable percentage of the social security fund into the market. It would have staved off the day of reconing, whch was the intent, but the day of reconing would have dawned far bleaker.

Thirdly, any justice in the mold of Scalia, Alito, or Thomas is going to vote to reverse Lawrence. Period. We will be one of the regimes criminalising same sex behaviour; our quarrels with Islam have to do with the flow of oil and the propping up of corrupt absolutist monarchies.

And a year into the presidency or so, after a stroke or a heart attack, we will have President Palin, Caribou Barbie as Commando in Chief. That gifted lady cannot count any understanding of economics or geopolitics or even bipartisanship amongst her gifts,. She is, however, a Domionist with a dangerous weltenschauung (world outlook) that includes an Armageddon, and an Apocolypse and a God who loves pipeline revenues for Alaska.

Robert Ganshorn Robert Ganshorn | September 23, 2008 1:58 AM

I dunno, I am confident they would keep McCain alive out of fear of her becoming president. All hypothetical of course, but he would get health care that has so far even kept Cheney alive. They are very good about providing health care (to themselves).

Our battle cry (I am loosely quoting Newt Gingrich) should be: "Have you had enough of those bastards yet?"

Shorter Sammon: "If I say nice things about McCain, maybe he'll do something for gays some day. He might! He's a maverick!"

Even Shorter Sammon: "Please sir, I want more"

McCain does make a good Mr. Bumble.....