Bo Shuff

Log Cabin Republicans - Explain This

Filed By Bo Shuff | October 16, 2008 1:00 PM | comments

Filed in: Fundie Watch, Politics
Tags: bigots, Colorado, general election, Szot

This was sent to me by my friend Dan who is working in Colorado. He's not connected to this race at all, but I think it is important to spread this information as far as possible.

After the cut is what Katherine Szot, Republican candidate for Colorado House District 18 said on a candidate questionnaire circulated by the Colorado Springs Pride Center.

Since John McCain is soooo big on people repudiating remarks or actions of people they are associated with, I openly call for the Log Cabin Republicans to repudiate these remarks.

From my biology classes in school, I learned that same-sex "couples" do not produce children. Children in these cases were produced outside of the "same-sex" relationships and have been into a life style that was not part of natural procreation. I have known children in these situations when teens had to face the reality of their upbringing, (sic) many were upset, some because rebellious and other just endured until they could leave home.

I have lived next to, worked with, and talked with many "gay and lesbian" individuals. Many lesbians became tired of the abuse from the male population and decided to "partner" with another woman that had been abused and de-humanized as they have been. I have talked with men that were "male bashed" by woman and had their spirit broken and possible physically injured, so they gave up on having a heterosexual relationship, which is a choice made by them, which also prevents them from having children. I have also read the chemicals in the water supply have actually changed male fish into female, changing their brain chemicals and hormones. Is this the reason that some men become submissive and give up their "manhood"? I don't know.

My whole concern with the "alternative" lifestyle is that true homosexuals can not reproduce; they have to recruit children to continue their group population, or go outside of a relationship to "produce" a child. It is no secret that disease in the homosexual community is very high and a by product of their life style.

Another question I have is if a same-sex couple is truly "homosexual" why does one of the partne rs seek to have a "sex change" when they can afford it? This expense alone is an elective surgery that has a high price tag and health risks.

I am not trying to belittle your organization, nor will I "candy coat" my responses. If a person hates themselves so much that they have to "change" their outer appearance or believe them selves (sic) to be something they are not, to feel better about them self (sic), they are sadly mistaken. An individual will never feel good about them self (sic) because of their outward appearance, look at all the movie stars, recording artists, models and very wealthy people that have died from over doses, anorexia, or other forms of suicide. A person must respect and love them self (sic) from within. If an individual has the confidence and personality to face the world for who they are then they will not drastic physical changes to be happy. When you have a healthy perspective of yourself, then, and only then can you have the maturity and emotional stability to love another person in a relationship that will be safe, nurturing and have mutual respect. This is true of any relationship, whether an adult intimate, friend or business associate.

Many adults have had bad experiences in their lives. Adults effect (sic) the lives of children, and the children have to try to cope with all the baggage placed in their lives by adults. Children learn hate from adults, (sic) children learn prejudice from adults, and above all children lean acceptance or rejection from adults

Additionally, her opponent is Michael Merrifield. I can only imagine that a late influx of cash would be a welcome thing to his campaign. Let's employ the old "Queer as a $3 bill" saying and flood his paypal account with a ton of $3 donations. Micheal Merrifield's Website

Then - email or post a link to this anywhere that you can.

Recent Entries Filed under Fundie Watch:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Actually, I think she provides a good oppurtunity for some basic education in LGBT issues, since she seems to get gays mixed up with transgendered people.

Her whole "non-procreative" slant on gay couples speaks to a simplistic and uneducated point of view and a lack of understanding regarding basic human nature as well. Only if she started pulling the tired old "well it says so in the bible", or faith tinged answers would I write her off as a hopeless case.

and you know the conservaqueer response to this: "But we're not trannies! If we just showed her how normal we all are, then she'd like the gays!"

From my biology classes in school, I learned that same-sex "couples" do not produce children.

So she supports sex ed classes? Well, that's something. :)

Wow. Wow.

I haven't seen this much ignorance coming from a single adult since, well, Sarah Palin.

And she's actually running for something other than evangelical loon du jour? *sigh*