Nan Hunter

The defense of the defense of marriage - and post Prop 8 right-wing rhetoric

Filed By Nan Hunter | December 13, 2008 5:30 PM | comments

Filed in: Marriage Equality, Politics
Tags: Alliance Defense Fund, Barack Obama, Congress, Democrats, DOMA, FMA, gay marriage, Marilyn Musgrave, marriage

With the Democrats having control of the White House and Congress, there won't be any federal marriage amendment moving anywhere in the next two years, and probably no time soon, if ever again. As icing on the cake, its chief sponsor in the House - Marilyn Musgrave of Colorado - was defeated last month.

ed2.jpgSo the anti-equality crew is reframing the congressional debate as one over whether to save DoMA from future efforts to repeal it. Toward that end, right wing politics now has a new web page if not a new idea. The Alliance Defense Fund has launched Protect DoMA. Aside from a northern Virginia P.O. box, Protect DoMA's chief asset appears to be a hunky Latino "model and actor" endorsing its message.

What is most interesting to me about this new angle on the old arguments are the clues that it contains to the right's long-term strategy, coming off their victory in passing Prop 8.

First is the unabashed emphasis on Latino Americans:

The Alliance for Marriage Foundation will work to continue to expand our education and mobilization efforts - especially within the Latino community

These folks are doubling down their bet on Latino-American cultural conservatism. Another theme, embedded in the quote below, is Latinos' status as the largest and fastest growing minority in the U.S. In other words, these are the young people who the right is counting on to disprove the conventional wisdom that as soon as the over-65 set dies off, the young adult demographic will legalize same-sex marriage:

Groups on the Left generally take Latino votes for granted. But the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life is the latest research foundation to document that this dynamic does not apply with respect to marriage and the family. On the contrary, support for marriage and family within the Latino community runs deep. This support is expressed when Latinos are given an opportunity to vote on the issue of marriage itself.

U.S. Census data shows that Latinos are the fastest-growing ethnic group, representing the largest minority in the country. According to data from 2005, there are approximately 42 million Latinos in the United States, which represents approximately 1 in every 8 residents. In fact, a majority of children entering high school, workers entering the workforce and newly-eligible voters will be Latino by 2020.

Also interesting to me is what's missing - religious rhetoric.

In the years ahead, will continue to build a broad movement - with a positive message that has mainstream appeal --- in order to deliver the margin of victory in the struggle to protect marriage for the sake of our children and grandchildren. At the same time, we will also continue to develop leaders who can give winsome expression to the timeless values that are essential to the well-being of our nation.

You gotta hand it to them there: Eduardo is nothing if not winsome.

One sign of this post-sectarian rhetorical strategy at work is a phrase that I've started to see on various right-wing sites: "the common-sense definition of marriage." Not the "traditional" and certainly not the religious definition, but the friendly, unthreatening "common-sense" definition. Sure sounds to me like these folks have gotten a PR makeover; they are seriously trying to sound contemporary, even downright cool. Like, not your grandfather's anti-gay bigotry.

The umbrella organization behind Protect DoMA - ADF - is probably the leading litigation shop trying to curtail same-sex relationship rights. Although its advisory board is loaded with clergy, it also has half a dozen law professors, including John Coons of U-C Berkeley (emeritus), John Finnis of Notre Dame, and Mary Ann Glendon of Harvard.

This is the face of the future -- on the other side.

Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Not surprising. If Latin American youth prove to be a deterrent to generational shifts on opinions concerning marriage equality, I see a gay community aligning with the right in a post-marriage era.

Florida showed that Latin American and African American youth-- 29 and younger, still voted in a solid majority to ban gay marriage.

Our opponents are not dumb, people. We better start cutting them off from framing the encounter.

Well of course they can't really go for the religious angle, consider most evangelicals consider the pope as running a close second to satan as the greatest source of evil.

There is no 'common sense' definition of marriage, it is something that they are creating out of whole cloth to cover their bigoted message of "Hey we don't like queer people either, so why don't you join us in this?".

Nan - do you have a link to a bigger version of the picture? I can't read what it says since it's so small. I'd like to dig up a bit of info on our "winsome" Latino actor.

You can enlarge the image at His name is Eduardo Verastegui.

sorry, that was me. I saw that the photo was inserted with form tags, and since that messes up some browsers I took them out. I also shrank it for front-page space efficiency, but I should have just re-uploaded it. I just did that, so it should work now.

Oh, the same guy who did the Pro-Prop. 8 ads? Imbecile.