Waymon Hudson

I Couldn't Say It Better: Florida Says Yes to Beating Kids, No to Gays Adopting

Filed By Waymon Hudson | September 02, 2009 10:30 AM | comments

Filed in: Politics
Tags: adoption ban, gay adoption, Glenna Milbank

This is one of the best juxtapositions of backwards Florida laws I have seen.

Glenna Milberg's blog, Milberg's Musings, recently had a great entry called "Who's Your Daddy", which looked at two different court cases happening at the same time in South Florida. One was a child abuse case against a man named Loscar Rodriguez, a father who "disciplined" his kid so much that they couldn't sit down because of the welts and bruises. The other was the case of Frank Gil, the gay man who is fighting to adopt two boys he fostered, which might just overturn Florida's ridiculous ban on gays adopting.

The outcomes of the two cases? The abuse case was dismissed in 12 minutes. The adoption case will take months, with more appeals sure to come. Milbank's conclusion is dead on:

Florida law bans gay people from adopting children.  But it protects the right to beat a child with an object until he/she is black and blue.

Milbank looks into why the abuse case was dismissed:

Back in criminal court, prosecutors cited case law that helped them decide the belt-wielding, lash-giving Rodriguez is not a child abuser under the law.  Turns out, in cases past, Florida appellate judges have opined "even significant bruises or welts from paddling" is discipline, not abuse; that "a strike on the face, a split lip, forced feeding" is - you guessed it - discipline, not abuse.   Exactly what does a child learn from that?  How and when to dole out the same violence when he/she grows up?

I guess being beaten to the point of bruising is "in the best interest of the child" according to Florida law. But being in a loving stable home with gay parents? You guessed it, unconstitutional:

He [Gill] and his partner had taken in the two young brothers who had known no other healthy family, and were eventually called exemplary fathers and family, but the state is appealing the adoption because Gill is gay.

You can't lay out the discrimination in more stark terms.

Recent Entries Filed under Politics:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

Well said.

This reminds me of Nevada 2002 when voters went to the polls to defeat a constitutional amendment banning legalized prostitution, but passed an amendment banning gay marriage.

At some point we have to recognize that a lot of the resistance for equal rights might just be anti-gay bigotry, and not set in any inherent moral beliefs.

Ignorance and fear are the enemies.
This one has a plenty.

What a juxtaposition! Just vivid!

Charlie re people recognizing their bigotry. Well since the teabaggers and birthers and deathers wont recognize their racism, how can we hope for that?