Michael Hamar

Oil Spill - a Gift of Bush/Cheney? - to Foul Entire East Coast?

Filed By Michael Hamar | May 06, 2010 11:30 AM | comments

Filed in: Living
Tags: Bob McDonnell, Bobby Jindal, Dick Cheney, economic crisis, environmental disaster, George W. Bush, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana, oil production

Having spent a couple of years as in-house counsel for an oil company, oil mapI do know a little bit about the oil industry and try not to be too quick to judge the industry negatively unless it is deserved. As such, I have been holding off any verdict on the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico until now.

The scenario continues to look worse and worse and it increasingly appears that this disaster might perhaps have been avoided - but for an unexplained policy change during the Bush/Cheney regime. This policy change may ultimately explain why the shattered BP well failed to have a costly type of blow out prevention such as is required by many other nations for wells drilled in their waters.

A New Republic story looks at this issue as to why the BP well did not have this - in retrospect - incredibly crucial piece of equipment. Here are some highlights:

Thanks to The Wall Street Journal's terrific reporting last week, there are two important things we already know.

First, an oil-drilling procedure called cementing--which is supposed to prevent oil and natural gas from escaping by filling gaps between the outside of the well pipe and the inside of the hole bored into the ocean floor--has been identified as a leading cause of well blowouts. Indeed, a 2007 study by the Minerals Management Service (or MMS, the division of the Interior Department responsible for offshore drilling) found that this procedure was implicated in 18 out of 39 blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over the 14 years it studied--more than any other factor. Cementing, which was handled by Halliburton, had just been completed prior to the recent explosion.

Second, the oil well now spewing large quantities of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico lacked a remote-control acoustic shutoff switch used by rigs in Norway and Brazil as the last line of defense against underwater spills. There's a story behind that.

As the Journal reports, after a spill in 2000, theMMS issued a safety notice saying that such a back-up device is "an essential component of a deepwater drilling system." The industry pushed back in 2001, citing alleged doubts about the capacity of this type of system to provide a reliable emergency backup. By 2003, government regulators decided that the matter needed more study after commissioning a report that offered another, more honest reason: "acoustic systems are not recommended because they tend to be very costly." I guess that depends on what they're compared to. The system costs about $500,000 per rig. BP is spending at least $5 million per day battling the spill, the well destroyed by the explosion is valued at $560 million, and estimated damages to fishing, tourism, and the environment already run into the billions.

There's something else we know, something that suggests an explanation for this sequence of events. After the Bush administration took office, the MMS became a cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest. In September 2008, Earl Devaney, Interior's Inspector General, delivered a report to Secretary Dirk Kempthorne that has to be read to be believed. One section, headlined "A Culture of Ethical Failure," documented the belief among numerous MMS staff that they were "exempt from the rules that govern all other employees of the Federal Government." They adopted a "private sector approach to essentially everything they did." This included "opting themselves out of the Ethics in Government Act."

So here's my question: what is responsible for MMS's change of heart between 2000 and 2003 on the crucial issue of requiring a remote control switch for offshore rigs? What we do know is that unfettered oil drilling was to Dick Cheney's domestic concerns what the invasion of Iraq was to his foreign policy--a core objective, implacably pursued regardless of the risks. Is there a connection between his infamous secret energy task force and the corrupt mindset that came to dominate a key program within MMS?

As for how bad will the spill get, the Washington Post has a frightening story that, if the predictions are true, could mean disaster for much of the east coast of the USA. Yes, all the way up to the Virginia coast and beyond. Bush and Cheney brought the nation an unnecessary war in Iraq, set the stage for the financial industry melt down, ran up huge deficits, authorized torture in violation of the Geneva Conventions, and made gay-baiting for election purposes an art form. If it turns out that Bush/Cheney had a hand in allowing this well to be drilled without equipment that could have averted this disaster, in addition to being tried for war crimes, we have another indictment against them. Here are highlights from the Washington Post story:

[W]ith each day that the leaking oil well a mile below the surface remains uncapped, scientists and energy industry observers are imagining outcomes that range from bad to worse to worst, with some forecasting a calamity of historic proportions.

Three scientists in separate interviews Tuesday said the gulf's "loop current," a powerful conveyor belt that extends about 3,000 feet deep, will almost surely take the oil down through the eastern gulf to the Straits of Florida, a week-long trip, roughly. The oil would then hang a sharp left, riding the Florida Current past the Keys and north again, directly into the Gulf Stream, which could carry it within spitting distance of Palm Beach and up the East Coast to Cape Hatteras, N.C.

For the moment, the oil flowing from the blown-out well in what the industry calls Mississippi Canyon Block 252 is still many miles north of the loop current. . . . The oil so far has barely touched coastal islands and hasn't come ashore, but environmentalists are poised for a catastrophic impact that could last decades.

At a news conference Tuesday, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) said he had asked federal officials to look for ways to increase the Mississippi River's flow to keep the slick at bay. "Let's make no mistake about what's at stake here," he said. "This is our very way of life."

For more terrifying analysis of the current disaster, see James Moore's piece at Huffington Post. Meanwhile, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell continues to favor drilling off the Virginia coast and, as Think Progress reports, has traveled to a BP-funded conference to push for more drilling.

Recent Entries Filed under Living:

Leave a comment

We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.

The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.

It's obvious that the set up for this type of disaster was okayed in the Bush era. You're so right.

Bill Perdue Bill Perdue | May 7, 2010 3:29 AM

Not so fast.

Certainly Bush did all he could to escalate deregulation in all sectors of the economy. But deregulation, like the wars and bigoted laws are bipartisan at their core.

"Deregulation has been the mantra on both sides of the aisle since the late 1960s..." It's the Deregulation, Stupid by James Ridgeway in Mother Jones, March 28, 2008 Deregulation by Carter, Reagan, the Bushes and Clinton combined with congressional malfeasance wrecked the economy and is exposing us to a very dangerous escalation of environmental hazards combined with further economic collapse.

We have every reason to believe that oil spill will be a monumental disaster and that like the Exxon Valdez spill, it'll never get cleaned up and that the criminally negligent oil companies will leave taxpayers to foot the bill.

There is a political solution to all this that's fair all around and eminently sensible.

That's to seize all the assets of BP until every last little bit of the oil spill is properly cleaned up and a fine, equal to the cleanup costs, is paid in full.

BP can afford it. The NY Times reported on February 2nd, 2010 that BP, the British oil company ...reported a $4.3 billion fourth-quarter profit... But the latest results marked a decline from the $5.3 billion BP posted in the third quarter of 2009. The BP chief executive, Tony Hayward, said in a statement that 2009 results had beaten the company’s own targets ... "as production was bolstered by output from the Thunder Horse field in the Gulf of Mexico..."

If the English looter class gets upset then we can seize all English assets in the US until all BP's bill are paid in full.

I wonder. Are Obama, Reid and Pelosi up to such a clean, elegant solution.

It would have had to have been OK'd in the Bush era, just as the current financial crisis was OK'd in the Clinton Era with Graham-Leach-Bliley. These things don't just happen right away - it takes years of neglect for disasters no one want to happen.

Of course, Rush is blaming Obama saying he did it on purpose to end offshore drilling (forgetting that Obama is actually pretty supportive of offshore drilling). But it's always Obama's fault!

A. J. Lopp | May 6, 2010 12:46 PM

Is there any chance the oil spill will reach Crawford, Texas? ... No? ... What a pity!

Thanks for speaking up.

The Gulf and decades of delay on global warming action may be a gift of:

-Anyone who believes that government has no role in society and the market fixes everything (and there are ideological folks who believe this in government right now. Sounds like this group in Denver might fall into that category.)... And the Haliburton connection certainly suggests a bread crumb trail to Cheney.

-People looking to create a soft landing in the private sector sector they oversee after they retire from government service.

-The great lobbying machine, which locks out most Americans from any clout and gives campaign gifts of tons of money to politicians. Including and often led by oil companies and DoD contractors. But they are just using a system politicians refuse to dismantle!

_Anyone who does not hold these folks accountable. They violated their oath.

John R. Selig | May 7, 2010 1:34 AM

Spill Baby Spill!

Bill Perdue Bill Perdue | May 7, 2010 3:38 AM

One very popular proposal is to store the unusable oil in the swimming pools of the rich, along with spent nuclear fuel rods.