Filed By Gloria Brame, Ph.D. | July 15, 2010 11:30 AM | comments
Filed in: Entertainment
Tags: gay pulp, gay stereotypes, queer pulp, vintage fiction, vintage gay
Does this cover -- hilarious as it is -- make a lick of sense to you? Is it an incest theme? Is "brother" code for gay? Is that Liberace dancing...for Elvis??
We want to know your opinion on this issue! While arguing about an opinion or idea is encouraged, personal attacks will not be tolerated. Please be respectful of others.
The editorial team will delete a comment that is off-topic, abusive, exceptionally incoherent, includes a slur or is soliciting and/or advertising. Repeated violations of the policy will result in revocation of your user account. Please keep in mind that this is our online home; ill-mannered house guests will be shown the door.
I'm puzzling over what the one in the chair is holding in his right hand. Can't be a remote control unit and it doesn't look quite like a pack of cigarettes.
I think its a taser. Or a 50s prototype. I think. I hope every single last copy of this book cover is eaten by termites
He's holding a glass by the top. This illustration obviously drawn by a straight artist and probably a serious homophobe.
My question would be "Which one is probably in denial about his sexual orientation?"
The cover was drawn by Gene Bilbrew, who was apparently a famous pulp and fetish artist in the 1950s and 1960s.
Here is how the back cover of the novel described the plot:
Butch business consultant Brad Stewart, on assignment at a famous fashion firm, is wooed by light-in-his-loafers young dress designer Johnny Dallance. But Ronnie Grimes, the rouged and lipsticked queen bee of the firm, is determined to keep Dallance in his hive of male drones. When luscious Pam Vincent tries to seduce Brad too, its anybody's guess which way he will turn!
Well, at least we know now what the cover is about. Johnny is performing a seductive dance to woo Brad before Pam gets her claws on him (Brad, that is, not Johnny.)